Illustrative modelExecutive reporting · Relevant to Automation, FP&A

The leadership reporting page

Leaders read one page. This build uses an invented division. It puts five measures against plan and prior year, ranks what moved them, and writes the story from the same numbers, so the sentence and the table cannot disagree.

What this shows

  • Five measures against plan and prior year
  • A drill from the headline to the region and the driver
  • Variance drivers ranked by size
  • A one-page view and a longer board view

How I use it

  • Preparing the page a senior leader reads before a meeting
  • Finding the driver behind a headline miss
  • Keeping the written commentary tied to the numbers

Explore the model below. It uses an invented company and invented numbers.

Explore the model

Illustrative model · Synthetic data

Wide tables scroll sideways: swipe inside a table to see every column.

Sample build: the leadership page

Fernhollow Services is an invented division. This is the page a senior leader reads before a meeting: five measures against plan and last year, what moved each one, and a written story built from the same figures as the tables.

Invented division for illustration. Not a real company's results.

What to try

  • Click a measure tile, then a region, to go from the headline to the cause.
  • Switch between plan and last year and watch the drivers and the story change.
  • Move the sliders for the actual year. Set the Europe price back to the plan level and the price drag in Europe closes.
  • Open the board view for the bridge, the region by driver grid and the checks.
Compare the actual year with
Audience

Fernhollow Services, an invented division

Full-year leadership page

Actual results against plan. One-page view.

Revenue is ahead of plan. Operating margin, cash conversion, cost per job and field technicians are behind plan.

Each gap is the actual less the comparison. A minus on revenue is a miss and a plus on cost is a miss. Pts means percentage points. Figures are rounded, so a column can differ from its total by the last digit.

The story in brief

  • Revenue was $927.6M, $27.6M (3.1%) ahead of plan ($900.0M). The main driver was jobs completed (+$35.0M), led by North America (+$40.0M), where it moved from 400K to 440K.
  • Operating margin was 16.1%, 1.9 points behind plan (18.0%). The main driver was labor rate (-1.0 pts), led by North America (-0.6 pts), where it moved from $50/hr to $52/hr.
  • Cash conversion was 85.0%, 7.5 points behind plan (92.5%). The main driver was days to get paid (-4.0 pts), led by Latin America (-2.6 pts), where it moved from 90 days to 110 days.
  • Cost per job was $752.2, $14.2 (1.9%) above plan ($738.0), which is adverse. The main driver was labor rate (+$8.7), led by North America (+$5.1), where it moved from $50/hr to $52/hr.
  • Field technicians were 4,610, 210 (4.8%) above plan (4,400), which is adverse. The main driver was jobs completed (+142), led by North America (+160), where it moved from 400K to 440K.

Look first at operating margin. Europe accounts for 1.1 points of the 1.9 point gap.

Why operating margin moved against plan

Operating profit as a share of revenue. Operating profit is revenue less labor, materials and travel, and fixed overhead.

Actual 16.1%. Plan 18.0%. Gap -1.9 pts Behind

Labor rate-1.0 ptsJobs completed+0.7 ptsPrice per job-0.7 ptsMaterials, travel-0.5 ptsHours per job-0.3 ptsFixed overhead-0.2 pts
Largest effect first. Teal helps the result and amber hurts it.

Drivers of the gap, all regions, largest first

DriverEffectLed by
Labor rateThe loaded cost of one technician hour.-1.0 ptsNorth America -0.6 pts
Jobs completedHow many jobs the region finished, in thousands.+0.7 ptsNorth America +0.8 pts
Price per jobWhat the region billed for each job.-0.7 ptsEurope -0.5 pts
Materials and travelParts, supplies and travel for each job.-0.5 ptsNorth America -0.5 pts
Hours per jobTechnician hours used on each job.-0.3 ptsAsia Pacific -0.3 pts
Fixed overheadCosts that do not move with the number of jobs.-0.2 ptsNorth America -0.2 pts

Revenue is $927.6M, $27.6M ahead of plan, and operating margin is 16.1%, 1.9 points behind plan, with labor rate the main driver (-1.0 pts).